On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 3:04 PM, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016 14:45:29 +0200 > Christian Pinto <c.pi...@virtualopensystems.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:57 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 06:03:13PM +0200, Christian Pinto wrote: > > > > > @@ -2990,6 +2990,8 @@ Device ID & Virtio Device \\ > > > > \hline > > > > 18 & Input device \\ > > > > \hline > > > > +19 & Signal Distribution Module \\ > > > > +\hline > > > > > > Please use a higher number, 19 is already proposed for virtio-vsock: > > > https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/201603/msg00042.html > > > > > > Thanks, I will use 20 then. > > I think virtio-crypto already wants to use 20. We sadly have a bit of a > backlog... > Thanks Cornelia, I'll use another number. BTW, Is there a way to know which one is the first free device ID? I was not following virtio-dev before, so not aware of all the pending device specs. Thanks, Christian
