On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:17:24PM +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
> 
> The "ICP" is a different object than the "XICS". For historical reasons,
> we have a number of places where we name a variable "icp" while it contains
> a XICSState pointer. There *is* an ICPState structure too so this makes
> the code really confusing.
> 
> This is a mechanical replacement of all those instances to use the name
> "xics" instead. There should be no functional change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
> [spapr_cpu_init has been moved to spapr_cpu_core.c, change there]
> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nik...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to