Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes:

> On 14/07/2016 14:02, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Looking at the perf data it looks like the hotest part of the code now
>> is cpu_get_tb_cpu_state which is required to get the initial hash to
>> search for the next tb.
>
> It should be possible to keep the flags up-to-date in a separate field
> of CPUARMState, similar to what x86 does.

Possibly, there is a tension between lazy and always upto date version
of the flags. But this is work for another day I think ;-)

>
> Paolo


--
Alex Bennée

Reply via email to