Am 27.07.2010 15:00, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On 07/27/2010 02:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Anthony Liguori<anth...@codemonkey.ws> writes: >> >> >>> - any additional input on probed_raw? >>> >> Isn't it a fait accompli? I stopped providing input when commit >> 79368c81 appeared. >> > > No. 79368c81 was to close the security hole (and I do consider it a > security hole). But as I mentioned on the list, I'm also not satisfied > with it and that's why I proposed probed_raw. I was hoping to get a > little more input from those that objected to 79368c81 as to whether > probed_raw was more agreeable.
Actually I believe qraw is less agreeable. It just too much magic. You wouldn't expect that your raw images are turned into some other format that you can't mount or use with any other program any more. Kevin
