On 07/27/2010 11:45 AM, malc wrote: >> + syms = realloc(syms, nsyms * sizeof(*syms)); > > Realloc can fail here.
I don't believe it can. This (pre-existing) statement *reduces* the existing allocation of syms. I'd be surprised if any malloc implementation fails on a size reduction. That said, I'd be happy enough to eliminate the call entirely. r~
