-- SUN OF A BEACH
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 20:32, Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> wrote: > TeLeMan <gele...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 19:51, Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> I hope this hepls to understand how subsections are supposed to work. >>> >>> Thanks for the comments, Juan. >>> >> I see, thanks a lot. But I still hope to have the similar subsection >> that can be ignored simply. > > Then it is better not to be sent in the 1st place. > > Do you have any example of why you want to do? When I dessigned > subsections, I looked at all the changes that we had from 0.11 to 0.12, > subsections can handle all of them. Just curious about what you need.\ > > Notice that ignoring subsections at this point is not trivial, as > (sub)sections don't have a size field. Working on getting size there, > but it is a long term project (it requires 1st to change everything to > VMState to be able to change how QEMUFile works). I have some extra data to be saved to vmstate and I want the new vmstate to be compatible with the official version. You are right, I thought it was simple. Now I discard my thought.
