On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:22:48 +0200
Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Line lengths above 80 characters do exist.  They are rare, but
> they happen from time to time.  An ignored rule is worse than an
> exception to the rule, so do the latter.
> 
> Some on the list expressed their preference for a soft limit that
> is slightly lower than 80 characters, to account for extra characters
> in unified diffs (including three-way diffs) and for email quoting.
> However, there was no consensus on this so keep the 80-character
> soft limit and add a hard limit at 90.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  CODING_STYLE          | 13 ++++++++++---
>  scripts/checkpatch.pl |  8 ++++++--
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

I would prefer a slightly bigger hard limit to allow for un-split
strings, but that's pushing into bike-shed territory. We can still
revisit that any time later.

Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com>


Reply via email to