On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 04:02:10PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> If a block job is started with a node name rather than a device name and
> no explicit job ID is passed, it was reported that '' isn't a
> well-formed ID. Which is correct, but we can make the message a little
> bit nicer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  blockjob.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefa...@redhat.com>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to