On Mon, 2016-09-05 at 12:58 +1000, David Gibson wrote: > > With the new chip class per cpu class, does this chip_type field > serve > any purpose any more? > > > + k->chip_f000f = 0x120d304980000000ull; > > A comment somewhere explaining what this cryptic value is would be > nice.
It's snapshot from an actual chip ;-) Some of the fields we know about such as the actual chip "type" and DD version but some are obscure even to us :-) Cheers, Ben. `
