On 22/09/2016 09:12, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes: > >> --- >> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl >> index dde3f5f..3afa19a 100755 >> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl >> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl >> @@ -2407,7 +2407,7 @@ sub process { >> # we have e.g. CONFIG_LINUX and CONFIG_WIN32 for common cases >> # where they might be necessary. >> if ($line =~ m@^.\s*\#\s*if.*\b__@) { >> - ERROR("architecture specific defines should be >> avoided\n" . $herecurr); >> + WARN("architecture specific defines should be >> avoided\n" . $herecurr); >> } >> >> # Check that the storage class is at the beginning of a declaration > > git-grep finds almost 400 of them. We certainly want people to think > twice (or thrice) before they add more. The question to discuss here is > whether we want to force that thinking onto the list. If yes, keep > ERROR. If no, downgrade to warn.
I actually count 450, but: - about a 100 are in imported code (disas/libvixl, include/standard-headers and linux-headers, disas) - another 40-odd hits are __NR_* syscall numbers - about 80 are in user-exec.c, block/raw-posix.c, util/oslib-posix.c, util/qemu-openpty.c, util/qemu-thread-posix.c which is probably unavoidable - another 30 are in tcg So this already covers more than half the hits. The patch is a bit of a heavy hammer, but I don't think it's an endemic problem that warrants a complaint on the list. If we want to keep the error, I think we should have: - a symbol blacklist. For example __linux__ and _WIN32 can be trivially replaced by CONFIG_LINUX and CONFIG_WIN32, and __GNUC__ is probably a bad idea (but __clang__ not so much; clang defines __GNUC__ for an absurdly old version). - a file blacklist, for example I would not expect target-*/ and hw/ should not have __ symbols and in fact they hardly have any and warn for everything else. Something for bite-sized tasks? Paolo