On 29/09/2016 02:16, David Gibson wrote: > Alternatively, if we *don't* want to remove class properties, should > we instead be trying to convert the many, many "instance" properties > whose existence is actually per-class to be class properties?
Yes, this was the point of introducing them. :) Paolo > David Gibson (4): > qcrypto: Remove usage of class properties > s390: Don't use class properties > tests: Remove tests for class properties > qom: Abolish class properties > > crypto/secret.c | 58 +++++++------- > crypto/tlscreds.c | 44 +++++----- > crypto/tlscredsanon.c | 16 ++-- > crypto/tlscredsx509.c | 26 +++--- > include/qom/object.h | 42 ---------- > qom/object.c | 195 > --------------------------------------------- > target-s390x/cpu.c | 1 - > target-s390x/cpu_models.c | 47 +++++------ > tests/check-qom-proplist.c | 30 +++---- > 9 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 353 deletions(-) >
