On 30/09/2016 10:33, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 19:15:05 +0200
> Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com> wrote:
...
>> @@ -230,9 +227,6 @@ static void test_unaligned_write_same(void)
>>          0x41, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x01, 0x00, 0x33, 0x00, 0x00
>>      };
>>  
>> -    qvirtio_scsi_start("-drive file=blkdebug::null-co://,if=none,id=dr1"
>> -                       ",format=raw,file.align=4k "
>> -                       "-device scsi-disk,drive=dr1,lun=0,scsi-id=1");
>>      vs = qvirtio_scsi_pci_init(PCI_SLOT);
>>  
>>      g_assert_cmphex(0, ==,
>> @@ -242,7 +236,7 @@ static void test_unaligned_write_same(void)
>>          virtio_scsi_do_command(vs, write_same_cdb_2, NULL, 0, buf2, 512, 
>> NULL));
>>  
>>      qvirtio_scsi_pci_free(vs);
>> -    qvirtio_scsi_stop();
>> +    qvirtio_scsi_stop(vs->qs);
> 
> Is still vs->qs still valid ? Also it looks wrong to call qvirtio_scsi_stop()
> without any prior call to qvirtio_scsi_start()...

The qvirtio_scsi_start() is called by qvirtio_scsi_pci_init().

Laurent

Reply via email to