On Mon, Aug 23, 2010, Kevin Wolf wrote: > How did you find this one? From a quick look it seems that the pattern > that name is intentionally overflowed to access extension is still there > in some places. So if this caused some real bug, I think we'll have to > fix the other ones, too.
Compiler found that one http://launchpadlibrarian.net/54142111/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-armel.qemu-maemo_0.0~20100806%2Bd7a5eb1-0ubuntu1~linaro2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz but I didn't quote it because I'm at a loss as to why it detected it now and on armel only. I think I just got one accidental build on a modern gcc-4.4 tree because of the timing of my copy of the packages. I guess I should build them more regularly under a recent gcc. -- Loïc Minier