10 окт. 2016 г. 23:22 пользователь "Richard Henderson" <r...@twiddle.net> написал: > > On 10/01/2016 05:05 AM, Artyom Tarasenko wrote: >> >> #define TTE_VALID_BIT (1ULL << 63) >> #define TTE_NFO_BIT (1ULL << 60) >> +#define TTE_NFO_BIT_UA2005 (1ULL << 62) >> #define TTE_USED_BIT (1ULL << 41) >> +#define TTE_USED_BIT_UA2005 (1ULL << 47) >> #define TTE_LOCKED_BIT (1ULL << 6) >> +#define TTE_LOCKED_BIT_UA2005 (1ULL << 61) >> #define TTE_SIDEEFFECT_BIT (1ULL << 3) >> +#define TTE_SIDEEFFECT_BIT_UA2005 (1ULL << 11) >> #define TTE_PRIV_BIT (1ULL << 2) >> +#define TTE_PRIV_BIT_UA2005 (1ULL << 8) >> #define TTE_W_OK_BIT (1ULL << 1) >> +#define TTE_W_OK_BIT_UA2005 (1ULL << 6) >> #define TTE_GLOBAL_BIT (1ULL << 0) > > > Hmm. Would it make more sense to reorg these as > > TTE_US1_* > TTE_UA2005_* > > with some duplication for the bits that are shared? > As is, it's pretty hard to tell which actually change...
All of them :-) I'm not sure about renaming: the US1 format is still used in T1 on the read access. On the other hand, it's not used in T2. And then again we don't have the T2 emulation yet. Artyom
