On 08/25/2010 05:19 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 08:46:15AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
BTW, something that had the features of qcow2 that people actually used
andwas fully asynchronous, performed well, and had a high degree of
confidence in data integrity would be a major step forward, not backwards.
That means you'll actually need to agree on a feature set first.
:)
The next image format should be raw-over-btrfs. And we need to continue
developing qcow2, we can't keep moving users from format to format just
because it's complicated.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
