On 24/10/2016 15:47, Kevin Wolf wrote: > One effect that makes me less than fully happy is that 'git log > block/raw.c' without --follow mixes the history of the renamed driver > with the history of the old, differently licensed one. On the other > hand, the removal of the old driver happened three years ago, so it's > probably unlikely that people confuse what belongs to which one and > revive old code accidentally.
Hmm, this makes it sensible to only apply patch 2, especially since Eric has corteously split them. :) Paolo
