19.10.2016 20:24, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 10/18/2016 03:17 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> Actually gcc suggests to use icm %r0,15,0(%r8). It's even shorter than >> lt %r0,0(%r8). > > Yep, that works too.
So what's the final patch for this, if any? :) Or should I just use extra -march? Thanks, /mjt
