> From: Cornelia Huck [mailto:cornelia.h...@de.ibm.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 11:25 PM > Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v13 1/2] virtio-crypto: Add virtio crypto > device specification > > On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 01:11:20 +0000 > "Gonglei (Arei)" <arei.gong...@huawei.com> wrote: > > > Nope, Actually I kept those description here is because I wanted to > > represent > each packet > > Intuitionally, otherwise I don't know how to explain them only occupy one > entry in desc table > > by indirect table method. So I changed the code completely as Stefan's > suggestion and > > revised the spec a little. > > I think you need to revise the spec a bit more :) IIUC, you should > simply state that you use the indirect table method and not mention any > guest physical addresses. > Yes, will remove the gpa description stuff. Using indirect table is a method for high performance and throughput, I'll mention it as a note. Pls see my another reply to Michael.
> > This just is a representative of the realization so that the people can > > easily > understand what > > the virtio crypto request's components. It isn't completely same with the > code. > > For virtio-scsi device, the struct virtio_scsi_req_cmd also used this way > > IIUR. > > It seemes to have caused at least some confusion - perhaps you > simplyfied too much? Yes, I will. Thanks, -Gonglei
