On 11/30/2016 01:47 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: > The first patch is the most important one here, it prepares the > build system to be able to deal with both, target-xxx and target/xxx > folders. Once that has been applied, each target architecture > could be moved to the target/ folder when it is convenient for the > subsytem maintainer to do the move (i.e. we do not have to move all > files immediately in one go). So if we agree to do this change and > the first patch has been committed, I could rather send the following > patches step by step to the maintainers so they can queue the patch > for their subsystem for a good point in time. And new architectures > like RISC-V and AVR could start in the target/ folder immediately > instead.
I don't see why we need to support both target-xxx and target/xxx/. Let's just move everything all at once. r~