On 10.09.2010, at 10:03, Kevin Wolf wrote:

> Am 09.09.2010 23:18, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> I make no claims that this is accurate or exhaustive but I think it's a
>> reasonable place to start.
>> 
>> As the file mentions, the purpose of this file is to give contributors
>> information about who they can go to with questions about a particular piece 
>> of
>> code or who they can ask for review.
>> 
>> If you sign up for a piece of code and indicate that it's Maintained or
>> Supported, please be prepared to be responsive to questions about that
>> subsystem.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com>
>> 
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index 79dfc7f..3894cd8 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -9,89 +9,388 @@ to be CC'd when submitting a patch to obtain appropriate 
>> review.
>> In general, if you have a question about inclusion of a patch, you should
>> consult qemu-devel and not any specific individual privately.
>> 
>> -Project leaders:
>> -----------------
>> +Please see the MAINTAINERS file in the Linux kernel for information about 
>> how
>> +to update this file.
> 
> Can't we just copy that one interesting section from Linux into this file?
> 
>> +Devices
>> +-------
>> +Virtio
>> +M: Anthony Liguori <aligu...@us.ibm.com>
>> +S: Supported
>> +F: hw/virtio*
> 
> Hm, what does this mean considering that we have later other entries
> like hw/virtio-9p*?

I'd say this means that both are shown as maintainer. See for example the KVM 
situation in the Linux kernel:

> KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE (KVM)
> M:      Avi Kivity <a...@redhat.com>
> M:      Marcelo Tosatti <mtosa...@redhat.com>
> L:      k...@vger.kernel.org
> W:      http://kvm.qumranet.com
> S:      Supported
> F:      Documentation/*/kvm.txt
> F:      arch/*/kvm/

> KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE (KVM) FOR POWERPC
> M:      Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>
> L:      kvm-...@vger.kernel.org
> W:      http://kvm.qumranet.com
> S:      Supported
> F:      arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm*
> F:      arch/powerpc/kvm/


Speaking of which ... is this one actually still valid?

> KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE For Itanium (KVM/IA64)
> M:      Xiantao Zhang <xiantao.zh...@intel.com>
> L:      kvm-i...@vger.kernel.org
> W:      http://kvm.qumranet.com
> S:      Supported
> F:      Documentation/ia64/kvm.txt
> F:      arch/ia64/include/asm/kvm*
> F:      arch/ia64/kvm/

Avi, any opinion on this?

> 
>> +vhost
>> +M: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
>> +S: Supported
>> +F: hw/vhost*
>> +
>> +virtio-9p
>> +M: JV Rao <jv...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> +S: Supported
>> +F: hw/virtio-9p*
>> +
>> +virtio-serial
>> +M: Amit Shah <amit.s...@redhat.com>
>> +S: Supported
>> +F: hw/virtio-serial*
>> +F: hw/virtio-console*
>> +
>> +IDE
>> +M: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
>> +S: Odd Fixes
>> +F: hw/ide/
>> +
>> +SCSI
>> +M: Paul Brook <p...@codesourcery.com>
>> +S: Odd Fixes
>> +F: hw/lsi53c895a.c
>> +F: hw/scsi*
> 
> In practice, virtio-blk, IDE and partly scsi-disk were done by me recently.

Submit a patch to declare you the maintainer please :).

> I didn't see the TCG backends in the list, are they missing?

They are there:

> Guest CPU cores (TCG):
> ----------------------



Alex

Reply via email to