> On 12 Jan 2017, at 07:05, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
> <vsement...@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
>
> Yes this is better. But is it actually needed to force contexts have some
> safe default? If context wants it may define such default without this
> requirement.. So, should it be requirement at all?
I've changed this to:
of the file), a server MAY reply with a single block status
descriptor with *length* matching the requested length, rather than
reporting the error; in this case the context MAY mandate the
status returned.
--
Alex Bligh
