Hi, Your series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information:
Message-id: 20170112165531.11882-1-pbonz...@redhat.com Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/10] aio_context_acquire/release pushdown, part 1 Type: series === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === #!/bin/bash BASE=base n=1 total=$(git log --oneline $BASE.. | wc -l) failed=0 # Useful git options git config --local diff.renamelimit 0 git config --local diff.renames True commits="$(git log --format=%H --reverse $BASE..)" for c in $commits; do echo "Checking PATCH $n/$total: $(git log -n 1 --format=%s $c)..." if ! git show $c --format=email | ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback -; then failed=1 echo fi n=$((n+1)) done exit $failed === TEST SCRIPT END === Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384 From https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu * [new tag] patchew/20170112165531.11882-1-pbonz...@redhat.com -> patchew/20170112165531.11882-1-pbonz...@redhat.com Switched to a new branch 'test' c3b6ff3 async: optimize aio_bh_poll 10daea4 aio: document locking c87dd80 aio-win32: remove walking_handlers, protecting AioHandler list with list_lock ebb7fc8 aio-posix: remove walking_handlers, protecting AioHandler list with list_lock a57c5b9 aio: tweak walking in dispatch phase ec80912 aio-posix: split aio_dispatch_handlers out of aio_dispatch 3477fee qemu-thread: optimize QemuLockCnt with futexes on Linux 5e9110c aio: make ctx->list_lock a QemuLockCnt, subsuming ctx->walking_bh 8babf64 qemu-thread: introduce QemuLockCnt 26a92ef aio: rename bh_lock to list_lock === OUTPUT BEGIN === Checking PATCH 1/10: aio: rename bh_lock to list_lock... Checking PATCH 2/10: qemu-thread: introduce QemuLockCnt... Checking PATCH 3/10: aio: make ctx->list_lock a QemuLockCnt, subsuming ctx->walking_bh... Checking PATCH 4/10: qemu-thread: optimize QemuLockCnt with futexes on Linux... ERROR: code indent should never use tabs #108: FILE: util/lockcnt.c:24: +#define QEMU_LOCKCNT_STATE_FREE 0^I/* free, uncontended */$ ERROR: code indent should never use tabs #109: FILE: util/lockcnt.c:25: +#define QEMU_LOCKCNT_STATE_LOCKED 1^I/* locked, uncontended */$ WARNING: line over 80 characters #165: FILE: util/lockcnt.c:81: + int new = expected - QEMU_LOCKCNT_STATE_LOCKED + QEMU_LOCKCNT_STATE_WAITING; WARNING: line over 80 characters #203: FILE: util/lockcnt.c:119: + val = atomic_cmpxchg(&lockcnt->count, val, val + QEMU_LOCKCNT_COUNT_STEP); WARNING: line over 80 characters #209: FILE: util/lockcnt.c:125: + if (qemu_lockcnt_cmpxchg_or_wait(lockcnt, &val, QEMU_LOCKCNT_COUNT_STEP, WARNING: line over 80 characters #245: FILE: util/lockcnt.c:161: + val = atomic_cmpxchg(&lockcnt->count, val, val - QEMU_LOCKCNT_COUNT_STEP); WARNING: line over 80 characters #253: FILE: util/lockcnt.c:169: + if (qemu_lockcnt_cmpxchg_or_wait(lockcnt, &val, locked_state, &waited)) { WARNING: line over 80 characters #258: FILE: util/lockcnt.c:174: + /* At this point we do not know if there are more waiters. Assume WARNING: line over 80 characters #294: FILE: util/lockcnt.c:210: + if (qemu_lockcnt_cmpxchg_or_wait(lockcnt, &val, locked_state, &waited)) { total: 2 errors, 7 warnings, 447 lines checked Your patch has style problems, please review. If any of these errors are false positives report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Checking PATCH 5/10: aio-posix: split aio_dispatch_handlers out of aio_dispatch... Checking PATCH 6/10: aio: tweak walking in dispatch phase... Checking PATCH 7/10: aio-posix: remove walking_handlers, protecting AioHandler list with list_lock... Checking PATCH 8/10: aio-win32: remove walking_handlers, protecting AioHandler list with list_lock... Checking PATCH 9/10: aio: document locking... Checking PATCH 10/10: async: optimize aio_bh_poll... === OUTPUT END === Test command exited with code: 1 --- Email generated automatically by Patchew [http://patchew.org/]. Please send your feedback to patchew-de...@freelists.org