On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:30:46 +0100 Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 26/01/2017 18:28, G 3 wrote: > > > > On Jan 26, 2017, at 12:00 PM, qemu-devel-requ...@nongnu.org wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> as you may know I've been collecting some ideas about documentation for > >> QEMU at http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Features/Documentation. > >> > >> I've now prepared a poll to understand how familiars developers are with > >> various documentation tools. I've CCed people with most commits to QEMU > >> documentation, or with whom I have discussed about this before, but > >> everybody's opinion is of course welcome! > >> > >> The poll is hosted with Google Forms and you can fill it in at > >> https://goo.gl/Yfxj1M. If you hate Google Forms, contact me offlist and > >> I'll send you the questions by email (and remind you when I need someone > >> to review my patches). > >> > >> Paolo > >> > >> > >> tl;dr: poll is at https://goo.gl/Yfxj1M > > > > > > For this question: > > What's your opinion on the maintainability of the following > > documentation formats? > > > > Is it from 1(least maintainable) to 5 (most maintainable)? > > > > The survey looks good. I will take it. > > Yes, all of them are 1=bad 5=good. Ugh, so I had my answers the wrong way round :( Most of the surveys I did recently had the order the other way round... I'll send another form.