On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 04:47:53PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 07.02.2017 03:56, Sam Bobroff wrote:
> > The last byte of the option vector was missing due to an off-by-one
> > error. Without this fix, client architecture support negotiation will
> > fail because the last byte of option vector 5, which contains the MMU
> > support, will be missed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sam Bobroff <sam.bobr...@au1.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.c
> > index 4f4c090a29..18dbc4a9ac 100644
> > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.c
> > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_ovec.c
> > @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ int spapr_ovec_populate_dt(void *fdt, int fdt_offset,
> >          }
> >      }
> >  
> > -    return fdt_setprop(fdt, fdt_offset, name, vec, vec_len);
> > +    return fdt_setprop(fdt, fdt_offset, name, vec, vec_len + 1);
> >  }
> 
> It took a while 'til I understood the encoding / length calculation of
> the property here, but I think you're right. According to LoPAPR the
> total length of the property is n+2 where n is the value of the first
> byte. Since n is vec_len-1 in the QEMU code, vec_len+1 is the right
> value for the property length.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com>

This is a correct fix regardless of the rest of the series, so I've
applied it to ppc-for-2.9.


-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to