On 15 February 2017 at 04:58, P J P <ppan...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hello Alistair, > > +-- On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Alistair Francis wrote --+ > | On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:52 AM, P J P <ppan...@redhat.com> wrote: > | > From: Prasad J Pandit <p...@fedoraproject.org> > | > > | > In the SDHCI protocol, the transfer mode register value > | > is used during multi block transfer to check if block count > | > register is enabled and should be updated. Transfer mode > | > register could be set such that, block count register would > | > not be updated, thus leading to an infinite loop. Add check > | > to avoid it. > | > > | > Reported-by: Wjjzhang <wjjzh...@tencent.com> > | > Reported-by: Jiang Xin <jiangx...@huawei.com> > | > Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit <p...@fedoraproject.org> > | > | Didn't I already review this? > > Yes, you did. I resent it owing to thread > > -> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-02/msg02898.html
Alistair's point is that when you resend a patchset where some patches have got reviews/acks and those patches haven't changed significantly, you should include the Reviewed-by: or Acked-by: tags in the commit messages on the resent patches, so that people know they don't need to reexamine those patches. thanks -- PMM
