On 15 February 2017 at 04:58, P J P <ppan...@redhat.com> wrote:
>   Hello Alistair,
>
> +-- On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Alistair Francis wrote --+
> | On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:52 AM, P J P <ppan...@redhat.com> wrote:
> | > From: Prasad J Pandit <p...@fedoraproject.org>
> | >
> | > In the SDHCI protocol, the transfer mode register value
> | > is used during multi block transfer to check if block count
> | > register is enabled and should be updated. Transfer mode
> | > register could be set such that, block count register would
> | > not be updated, thus leading to an infinite loop. Add check
> | > to avoid it.
> | >
> | > Reported-by: Wjjzhang <wjjzh...@tencent.com>
> | > Reported-by: Jiang Xin <jiangx...@huawei.com>
> | > Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit <p...@fedoraproject.org>
> |
> | Didn't I already review this?
>
> Yes, you did. I resent it owing to thread
>
>   -> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-02/msg02898.html

Alistair's point is that when you resend a patchset where
some patches have got reviews/acks and those patches haven't
changed significantly, you should include the Reviewed-by:
or Acked-by: tags in the commit messages on the resent patches,
so that people know they don't need to reexamine those patches.

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to