Hi, > I'm not sure here if we want to just have this as a bald list, > or to have some kind of two tier setup with OSes we expect to > dump in one tier and OSes where we're really trolling for a build > machine in the other tier (the "unlikely to dump" category would > get most of the BSD variants in it). Putting out a changelog > that says "we're gonna drop all the BSDs" seems like it might > produce a lot of yelling?
Maybe we should have two levels of support. Level one would be "machine for test builds available", level two would be "someone looking after it". At least the freebsd guys have been posting patches to fix freebsd bugs in the past. Can't remember a recent post though, dunno whenever that is because we didn't break anything or because they stopped bothering to send their ports collection patches upstream. usb-host support for bsd used to break now and then, but with the switch to libusb that particular problem area went away a while back ... cheers, Gerd
