* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>
> On 13/03/2017 13:44, Juan Quintela wrote:
> > case RAM_SAVE_FLAG_MULTIFD_PAGE:
> > fd_num = qemu_get_be16(f);
> > - if (fd_num != 0) {
> > - /* this is yet an unused variable, changed later */
> > - fd_num = fd_num;
> > - }
> > + multifd_recv_page(host, fd_num);
> > qemu_get_buffer(f, host, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE);
> > break;
>
> I still believe this design is a mistake.
Is it a use of a separate FD carrying all of the flags/addresses that
you object to?
Dave
> Paolo
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
