* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > On 13/03/2017 13:44, Juan Quintela wrote: > > case RAM_SAVE_FLAG_MULTIFD_PAGE: > > fd_num = qemu_get_be16(f); > > - if (fd_num != 0) { > > - /* this is yet an unused variable, changed later */ > > - fd_num = fd_num; > > - } > > + multifd_recv_page(host, fd_num); > > qemu_get_buffer(f, host, TARGET_PAGE_SIZE); > > break; > > I still believe this design is a mistake.
Is it a use of a separate FD carrying all of the flags/addresses that you object to? Dave > Paolo -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK