On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Hollis Blanchard <hol...@penguinppc.org> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Stefan Weil <w...@mail.berlios.de> wrote: >> >> Hollis, do you still see problems with my patch? >> Or can it be committed? > > I have no objection; I was just anticipating Blue's objection when I > commented previously. It's just a style question really...
Both ((int)op >= 0 && op < NB_OPS) and ((unsigned int)op < NB_OPS) produce same binary (if NB_OPS < MAX_INT). During the earlier, long discussion, the int version was preferred.
