On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 10:45:54PM +0300, Yuval Shaia wrote: > > Just add my 2 cents. You didn't answer on my question about other possible > > implementations. It can be SoftRoCE loopback optimizations, special ULP, > > RDMA transport, virtual driver with multiple VFs and single PF. > > Please see my response to Jason's comments - eventually, when a support for > VM to external host communication will be added - kdbr will become ULP as > well.
So, is KDBR only to be used on the HV side? Ie it never shows up in the VM? That is even weirder, we certainly do not want to see a kernel RDMA ULP for any of this - the entire point of RDMA is to let user space implement their protocols without needing a unique kernel component!! Jason
