Am 20.04.2017 um 17:30 hat Daniel P. Berrange geschrieben:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:00:03PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <f...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > block/sheepdog.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/sheepdog.c b/block/sheepdog.c
> > index fb9203e..7e889ee 100644
> > --- a/block/sheepdog.c
> > +++ b/block/sheepdog.c
> > @@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ static int connect_to_sdog(BDRVSheepdogState *s, Error
> > **errp)
> > qemu_set_nonblock(fd);
> > } else {
> > fd = -EIO;
> > + error_setg(errp, "Failed to connect to sheepdog server");
> > }
>
> This doesn't make much sense to me. The lines just above the
> diff context have this:
>
> fd = socket_connect(s->addr, errp, NULL, NULL);
>
> socket_connect should have already reported an error on "errp"
> in the scenario that 'fd == -1'.
By the way, am I the only one who thinks that having errp anywhere else
than as the last argument is bad style? I can easily see myself missing
that this functions sets it because the last argument is NULL.
Kevin
