"Daniel P. Berrange" <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: > Historically the migration data channel has only needed to be > unidirectional. Thus the 'exec:' protocol was requesting an > I/O channel with O_RDONLY on incoming side, and O_WRONLY on > the outgoing side. > > This is fine for classic migration, but if you then try to run > TLS over it, this fails because the TLS handshake requires a > bi-directional channel. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> Actually, lots of people request that we have bi-directional communication always that it is possible.