"Daniel P. Berrange" <berra...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Historically the migration data channel has only needed to be
> unidirectional. Thus the 'exec:' protocol was requesting an
> I/O channel with O_RDONLY on incoming side, and O_WRONLY on
> the outgoing side.
>
> This is fine for classic migration, but if you then try to run
> TLS over it, this fails because the TLS handshake requires a
> bi-directional channel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berra...@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com>

Actually, lots of people request that we have bi-directional
communication always that it is possible.

Reply via email to