On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 1:23 PM Amarnath Valluri <amarnath.vall...@intel.com> wrote:
> > > On 05/02/2017 06:54 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > > Hi > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:53 PM Amarnath Valluri < > amarnath.vall...@intel.com> wrote: > >> Provide base implementation of realloc_buffer(), so that backend >> implementations >> can resue. >> >> > I doubt that base class facility helps at this point, and would suggest > moving it to tpm-tis only. > > The intention here is to provided the default implementation in base > class, still backends can overwrite with their suitable reallocation size. > > But no other backend uses it. -- Marc-André Lureau
