On 22.05.2017 13:35, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 12:50:30 +0300
Evgeny Yakovlev <eyakov...@virtuozzo.com> wrote:
When running windows 2016 server guests we have encountered a problem
with ACPI representation of CPU devices. This windows version contains a
hidinterrupt.sys driver which looks for ACPI device node with _HID set
to "ACPI0010" and "ACPI0011". ACPI0010 is also a valid id for CPU
container device which qemu uses.
hidinterrupt driver takes over (even though it fails) ACPI0010 node and
thus hides its children -- the CPUs -- from the regular ACPI
enumeration. So there are no processors in the Windows device tree
Device Manager or "!devnode 0 1" in the debugger.
hidinterrupt.inf as shipped with Windows 2016 has both ACPI0011 and
ACPI0010; the record for the latter is preceded with a comment "This Id
is not to be used. It will be removed once everyone has stopped using
it." So I guess the typo was not in the driver but in the ACPI tables
of some device(s) which the driver wanted to support despite the bug.
For reference this is a known issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377155#c31
This change works around this problem by setting qemu CPU container ACPI
_HID to compatible PNP0A05.
I'd say NACK to it.
It's Windows server 2016 bug that violates spec and
it's been reported to them before RTM has been released.
So complain to Microsoft support and make them fix it.
Meanwhile there is MS suggested workaround to fix issue,
one can use https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377155#c17
Perhaps I should add workaround link as comment above line:
aml_append(cpus_dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("ACPI0010")));
Thanks for replying!
Strictly speaking, this is not a Windows bug. Comment in INF file says
that they had to support a hardware device which erroneously picked this
ACPI HID.
I understand that this is not a qemu problem either. Then again other
emulators we've tested this on (VirtualBox, Parallels, HyperV) provide a
compatible ACPI configuration and don't trigger this conflict. If this
fix is not a big deal and does not affect anything negatively then maybe
we pay a relatively small price to improve compatibility with some guest
systems?
Signed-off-by: Evgeny Yakovlev <eyakov...@virtuozzo.com>
---
hw/acpi/cpu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/acpi/cpu.c b/hw/acpi/cpu.c
index a233fe1..b93db40 100644
--- a/hw/acpi/cpu.c
+++ b/hw/acpi/cpu.c
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ void build_cpus_aml(Aml *table, MachineState *machine,
CPUHotplugFeatures opts,
Aml *rm_evt = aml_name("%s.%s", cphp_res_path, CPU_REMOVE_EVENT);
Aml *ej_evt = aml_name("%s.%s", cphp_res_path, CPU_EJECT_EVENT);
- aml_append(cpus_dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("ACPI0010")));
+ aml_append(cpus_dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("PNP0A05")));
aml_append(cpus_dev, aml_name_decl("_CID", aml_eisaid("PNP0A05")));
method = aml_method(CPU_NOTIFY_METHOD, 2, AML_NOTSERIALIZED);
