"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilb...@redhat.com> wrote: > * Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote: >> There is no reason for having the loadvm_handlers at all. There is >> only one use, and we can use the savevm handlers. >> >> We will remove the loadvm handlers on a following patch. > > <snip> > >> trace_qemu_loadvm_state_section_partend(section_id); >> - QLIST_FOREACH(le, &mis->loadvm_handlers, entry) { >> - if (le->section_id == section_id) { >> + QTAILQ_FOREACH(se, &savevm_state.handlers, entry) { >> + if (se->section_id == section_id) { > > Isn't this the problem? What guarantees that the se->section_id > is the same as the source's section_id - I don't think anything. > It's just dynamically allocated in register_savevm_live so the > initialisation order on source/dest could be different and you'd > get different ID. You can't update se->section_id > unless you guaranteed to updated all of them.
Ok. It worked for me because I was using the same command line in both sides. Changed to add load_section_id and adjust all around. Thanks, Juan.