On 2017-05-24 22:28, Eric Blake wrote: > The lone caller that cares about a return of BDRV_BLOCK_RAW > (namely, io.c:bdrv_co_get_block_status) completely replaces the > return value, so there is no point in passing BDRV_BLOCK_DATA. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
Technically true, but conflicts with the documentation in block.h. If you really want this changed, you should document in block.h what exactly it is that BDRV_BLOCK_RAW does. Max
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
