On 05/31/2017 09:34 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: > We should properly forward the CPUID format bit. CPU model > detection on systems without IBC might select a model with a wrong > CPU type (esp. selecting the business class (BC) model on an enterprise > class (EC) machine). So let's improve that, too. > > I am also preparing a patch to properly indicate the correct cpu type > to the guest via STORE CPU ID and STORE HYPERVISOR INFORMATION for the > TCG case, but will send that separately after I tested it (want to write a > kvm-unit-test for STORE CPU ID). > > David Hildenbrand (2): > s390x/cpumodel: take care of the cpuid format bit for KVM > s390x/cpumodel: improve defintion search without an IBC > > target/s390x/cpu_models.c | 10 ++++++++++ > target/s390x/cpu_models.h | 10 +++++++--- > target/s390x/kvm.c | 1 + > 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >
I like both patches in terms of "yes, its the right thing to do". Jason can you have a look? I might need some days to catch up with other things before I can look into the patches.
