On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 15:49:15 +0100 Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote:
> The thread-id of 0 means any CPU but we then ignore the fact we find > the first_cpu in this case who can have an index of 0. Instead of > bailing out just test if we have managed to match up thread-id to a > CPU. > > Otherwise you get: > gdb_handle_packet: command='vCont;C04:0;c' > put_packet: reply='E22' > > The actual reason for gdb sending vCont;C04:0;c was fixed in a > previous commit where we ensure the first_cpu's tid is correctly > reported to gdb however we should still behave correctly next time it > does send 0. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> > Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org> > > --- > v2 > - used Greg's less convoluted suggestion > - expand commit message > --- > gdbstub.c | 15 ++++----------- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gdbstub.c b/gdbstub.c > index 45a3a0b16b..6b1e72e9f7 100644 > --- a/gdbstub.c > +++ b/gdbstub.c > @@ -937,23 +937,16 @@ static int gdb_handle_vcont(GDBState *s, const > char *p) if (res) { > goto out; > } > - idx = tmp; > + > /* 0 means any thread, so we pick the first valid CPU */ > - if (!idx) { > - idx = cpu_gdb_index(first_cpu); > - } > + cpu = tmp ? find_cpu(tmp) : first_cpu; > > - /* > - * If we are in user mode, the thread specified is > actually a > - * thread id, and not an index. We need to find the > actual > - * CPU first, and only then we can use its index. > - */ > - cpu = find_cpu(idx); > /* invalid CPU/thread specified */ > - if (!idx || !cpu) { > + if (!cpu) { > res = -EINVAL; > goto out; > } > + > /* only use if no previous match occourred */ > if (newstates[cpu->cpu_index] == 1) { > newstates[cpu->cpu_index] = cur_action; Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>