On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 10:02:17 -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > On 06/06/2017 09:25 AM, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > >For this particular case we can get away without padding the structs if > >we're OK with having the end of a TB struct immediately followed > >by its translated code, instead of having that code on the following > >cache line. > > Uh, no, if you can manually pad before the struct, you can manually pad > after the struct too.
Yes of course =) I'll respin the series to do this.
E.
