On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 11:18:46AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 04:41:46PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 07:18:07AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > > > On 05/09/2017 07:13 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 07:05:51AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > > > > > > Daniel P. Berrange (2): > > > > > > i386: rewrite way CPUID index is validated > > > > > > i386: expose "TCGTCGTCGTCG" in the 0x40000000 CPUID leaf > > > > > > > > > > I probably should have commented earlier but... what's the point? > > > > > > > > > > If you want the guest os to actually do anything with this, what do > > > > > you gain for advertising TCG over KVM? > > > > > > > > I can see this being useful from virt-what, since it would allow > > > > vendors to diagnose problems being caused by TCG ... > > > > > > Thanks, that's an excellent point. > > > > Richard, Paolo: I would like to merge this. Do you agree? > > ping, since there's no objections can we merge this now ?
Queued on x86-next. Thanks! -- Eduardo
