On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 21:41:51 +1000 David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 01:15:00PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 13:01:26 +0200
> > Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Commit 5f3066d ("target/ppc: Allow workarounds for POWER9 DD1")
> > > disables compatibility mode for POWER9 DD1 to allow to
> > > boot on POWER9 DD1 host with KVM.
> > >
> > > As the workaround has been added in kvmppc_host_cpu_class_init(),
> > > it applies only on CPU created with "-cpu host".
> > > As we want to be able to use also "-cpu POWER9" on a POWER9 DD1
> > > host, this patch moves the workaround from kvmppc_host_cpu_class_init()
> > > to init_proc_POWER9().
> > >
> >
> > As with ppc_cpu_initfn() in your previous version, init_proc_POWER9() is
> > called for every CPU instance.. ie, all CPU will adjust the @pcr_supported
> > class attribute...
>
> Ah.. yeah.. I didn't notice that before. That's definitely not right.
>
> > What about moving the workaround to ppc_POWER9_cpu_family_class_init()
> > instead ? This would just require to expose mfpvr() in some header.
>
> Yeah, as someone else pointed out using the host PVR is also
> definitely not right (unless you're in a function specifically
> connected to the host cpu class).
>
I agree but the root issue is that we accept to pass -cpu POWER9 instead of
-cpu host with -enable-kvm. And the host cpu class isn't involved in this
case.
> >
> > --- a/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> > +++ b/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> > @@ -8913,8 +8913,10 @@ POWERPC_FAMILY(POWER9)(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
> > dc->props = powerpc_servercpu_properties;
> > pcc->pvr_match = ppc_pvr_match_power9;
> > pcc->pcr_mask = PCR_COMPAT_2_05 | PCR_COMPAT_2_06 | PCR_COMPAT_2_07;
> > - pcc->pcr_supported = PCR_COMPAT_3_00 | PCR_COMPAT_2_07 |
> > PCR_COMPAT_2_06 |
> > - PCR_COMPAT_2_05;
> > + if (!kvm_enabled() || (mfpvr() & 0xffffff00) !=
> > CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_DD1) {
> > + pcc->pcr_supported = PCR_COMPAT_3_00 | PCR_COMPAT_2_07 |
> > + PCR_COMPAT_2_06 | PCR_COMPAT_2_05;
> > + }
> > pcc->init_proc = init_proc_POWER9;
> > pcc->check_pow = check_pow_nocheck;
> > cc->has_work = cpu_has_work_POWER9;
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lviv...@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > target/ppc/kvm.c | 11 -----------
> > > target/ppc/translate_init.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> > > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/target/ppc/kvm.c b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> > > index f2f7c53..9d76817 100644
> > > --- a/target/ppc/kvm.c
> > > +++ b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> > > @@ -2381,17 +2381,6 @@ static void kvmppc_host_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass
> > > *oc, void *data)
> > >
> > > #if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
> > > pcc->radix_page_info = kvm_get_radix_page_info();
> > > -
> > > - if ((pcc->pvr & 0xffffff00) == CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_DD1) {
> > > - /*
> > > - * POWER9 DD1 has some bugs which make it not really ISA 3.00
> > > - * compliant. More importantly, advertising ISA 3.00
> > > - * architected mode may prevent guests from activating
> > > - * necessary DD1 workarounds.
> > > - */
> > > - pcc->pcr_supported &= ~(PCR_COMPAT_3_00 | PCR_COMPAT_2_07
> > > - | PCR_COMPAT_2_06 | PCR_COMPAT_2_05);
> > > - }
> > > #endif /* defined(TARGET_PPC64) */
> > > }
> > >
> > > diff --git a/target/ppc/translate_init.c b/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> > > index 783bf98..a41fe66 100644
> > > --- a/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> > > +++ b/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> > > @@ -8811,6 +8811,8 @@ static struct ppc_radix_page_info
> > > POWER9_radix_page_info = {
> > >
> > > static void init_proc_POWER9(CPUPPCState *env)
> > > {
> > > + PowerPCCPU *cpu = ppc_env_get_cpu(env);
> > > + PowerPCCPUClass *pcc = POWERPC_CPU_GET_CLASS(cpu);
> > > /* Common Registers */
> > > init_proc_book3s_common(env);
> > > gen_spr_book3s_207_dbg(env);
> > > @@ -8848,7 +8850,18 @@ static void init_proc_POWER9(CPUPPCState *env)
> > >
> > > /* Allocate hardware IRQ controller */
> > > init_excp_POWER8(env);
> > > - ppcPOWER7_irq_init(ppc_env_get_cpu(env));
> > > + ppcPOWER7_irq_init(cpu);
> > > +
> > > + if ((pcc->pvr & 0xffffff00) == CPU_POWERPC_POWER9_DD1) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * POWER9 DD1 has some bugs which make it not really ISA 3.00
> > > + * compliant. More importantly, advertising ISA 3.00
> > > + * architected mode may prevent guests from activating
> > > + * necessary DD1 workarounds.
> > > + */
> > > + pcc->pcr_supported &= ~(PCR_COMPAT_3_00 | PCR_COMPAT_2_07
> > > + | PCR_COMPAT_2_06 | PCR_COMPAT_2_05);
> > > + }
> > > }
> > >
> > > static bool ppc_pvr_match_power9(PowerPCCPUClass *pcc, uint32_t pvr)
> >
>
>
>
pgpJ0SppkPfkD.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
