* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote:
> We need that on posterior patches.

following/subsequent/later is probably a better word.

other than that;


Reviewed-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com>

> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  migration/migration.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/migration/migration.c b/migration/migration.c
> index 5a82c1c..b81c498 100644
> --- a/migration/migration.c
> +++ b/migration/migration.c
> @@ -356,19 +356,31 @@ static void process_incoming_migration_co(void *opaque)
>      qemu_bh_schedule(mis->bh);
>  }
>  
> -void migration_fd_process_incoming(QEMUFile *f)
> +static void migration_incoming_setup(QEMUFile *f)
>  {
> -    Coroutine *co = qemu_coroutine_create(process_incoming_migration_co, f);
> +    MigrationIncomingState *mis = migration_incoming_get_current();
>  
>      if (multifd_load_setup() != 0) {
>          /* We haven't been able to create multifd threads
>             nothing better to do */
>          exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>      }
> +    mis->from_src_file = f;
>      qemu_file_set_blocking(f, false);
> +}
> +
> +static void migration_incoming_process(void)
> +{
> +    Coroutine *co = qemu_coroutine_create(process_incoming_migration_co, 
> NULL);
>      qemu_coroutine_enter(co);
>  }
>  
> +void migration_fd_process_incoming(QEMUFile *f)
> +{
> +    migration_incoming_setup(f);
> +    migration_incoming_process();
> +}
> +
>  gboolean migration_ioc_process_incoming(QIOChannel *ioc)
>  {
>      MigrationIncomingState *mis = migration_incoming_get_current();
> -- 
> 2.9.4
> 
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK

Reply via email to