On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote: > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> writes: >>> This isn't appropriate for 2.10 now we are feature frozen. That said I >> >> Surely. From the cover: >> >> "... provided at the end of this series as RFC for people wanted >> to give a try (also include 'dockershell' script and a fix in >> ./configure). These RFC patches (33-35) are not expected to enter >> 2.10." > > My mistake - I hadn't gone over the cover letter. I would usually expect > a series with [PATCH for 2.10] just to contain stuff being considered > for the immediate future.
Ah I see, I used --subject-prefix='PATCH for 2.10' thinking "I'v to remember to mark the 3 last patches as "RFC" and when I prefixed with "RFC" I forgot to remove the "for 2.10" suffix. My bad!
