Hi, > > Gerd's suggestion was to set min(cap_value, children_found). From > > such > > point of view 0 can be a valid value. > > > > I am lost now :) > How can we use the capability to reserve "more" buses since > children-found will be always the smaller value? > > I think you should use max(cap_value, children_found) to > ensure you always reserve enough buses for existing children.
Was about to point out the same ;) Yes, should be max(reserve-buses, child-buses-found). And reserve- buses is actually a minimum, because the result can't be smaller than reserve-buses. cheers, Gerd