On Mon, 08/21 11:17, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > From previous discussions we've had, one suggestion was to have some > type of 'safe' command; once issued in a thread, the monitor thread > would only allow other lock-free commands to be issued; it stops any > accidents of them issuing unsafe commands.
I'm not sure I understand. If the 'safe' command is not issued, users are allowed to do unsafe things? What are the possible consequences of those 'unsafe' commands? Errors/hangs/crashes? Fam