On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:18:07PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 16 August 2017 at 11:51, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 16/08/2017 10:26, Cornelia Huck wrote: > >> Prefer to use the tcg accelarator if it is available: This is our only > >> real smoke test for tcg, and fast enough to use it for that. > > > > I'm not sure this is required for 2.10. Yes, it means the coverage from > > "make check" is worse, but that's it. > > Yes, I'd put it under "if we need to roll an rc4 anyway for > some more significant bug we might as well put this in too, > but it doesn't merit cutting rc4 by itself."
It does entirely break "make check" on a ppc host. And that in turn
has held up my testing cycle for a couple of ppc regressions from 2.9
that I was hoping to squeeze in. Does that change your calculations?
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
