On 11/26/10 16:19, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> On 26.11.2010, at 16:10, Peter Maydell wrote:
> 
>> On 26 November 2010 14:21, Anthony Liguori <anth...@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
>>
>>> But the key point is breadth, it should not be a "KVM Forum" but rather an
>>> Open Virtualization conference with topics as high level as cloud software
>>> automation and as low level as asynchronous page faults :-)
>>
>> Does that breadth include the emulation/TCG side of qemu or only
>> the virtualisation/KVM side? I'm never quite sure with titles that
>> just say "Virtualization"...
> 
> Historically, virtualization gatherings have been fairly non-tcg friendly. I 
> don't see why we'd have to continue that trend though. A lot of the code 
> actually affects both sides.

IMHO it would be good to have focus on broader QEMU collaboration,
including TCG.

Cheers,
Jes

Reply via email to