On 09/08/2017 01:11 PM, Brandon Carpenter wrote: > My apologies. I read that document before submitting the patch, but > there was a lot to take in. Would you like me to resend the patch > without the references?
Not a problem - we all had to submit our first patch at some point in time in the past :) Re-sending at this point shouldn't be necessary unless a maintainer specifically asks for it; it's more information for next time (if you have to send a v3, for whatever reason). > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, > is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain > proprietary, confidential or privileged information or otherwise be > protected by law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or > distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, > please notify the sender and destroy all copies and the original message. By the way, your employer's disclaimer is unenforceable on a publicly-archived mailing list; still, it may be worth replying from a person account to avoid the risk of someone refusing to reply to your mail on principle. -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
