> >> Sorry, I didn't get what you're trying to tell me. My plan would > >> be to initially start from a subset of devices, and gradually > >> grow the number of devices that Kemari works with. While this > >> process, it'll include what you said above, file a but and/or fix > >> the code. Am I missing what you're saying? > > > > My point is that the whitelist shouldn't exist at all. Devices either > > support migration or they don't. Having some sort of separate whitelist > > is the wrong way to determine which devices support migration. > > Alright! > > Then if a user encounters a problem with Kemari, we'll fix Kemari > or the devices or both. Correct?
Correct. Paul
