On 9 September 2017 at 21:30, Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> wrote: > However, I have a suggestion for Igor: making a separate patch > that renames the existing property to "x-cpu-model", and using > "x-cpu-type" in this series. This way we will explicitly > document the fact that the property is not a stable > user/management interface.
We have lots and lots of properties on non-user-instantiated devices that aren't intended as user level configurable things... thanks -- PMM
