On 13.09.2017 16:29, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 13.09.2017 15:24, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> Implemented in sclp.c, so let's move it to the right include file. >> Fix up one include. Do a forward declaration of struct CPUS390XState to >> fix the two sclp consoles complaining. > > Is that sentence about the forward declaration still valid? I did not > see that anymore here...
Nope, a leftover. Conny, can you fix this up if I don't have to resend? Thanks! > > Apart from that: > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> > > -- Thanks, David
